Xiaomi 13T Smartphone in review

Date:

More affordable and almost as good. If the Xiaomi 13 proves to be too expensive for your budget, consider exploring the more affordable Xiaomi 13T. It is similarly well-equipped and closely rivals the flagship in terms of performance. With a 6.67-inch display, the device features a remarkably bright AMOLED screen with a 144 Hz refresh rate, complemented by a triple camera system enhanced by Leica, featuring 2x optical zoom. Additionally, the Xiaomi 13T offers an impressive 5-year update support.

Xiaomi 13T

The Xiaomi 13T is the most affordable entry-level model in Xiaomi’s 13T series, positioned slightly below the Xiaomi 13 series. Priced at $599, it shares many similarities with its more expensive counterpart, offering an extensive range of features. Notable features include a 50 MP camera system developed in collaboration with Leica, incorporating a zoom lens, a remarkably bright AMOLED display with a 144 Hz refresh rate, and an impressive 5 years of extended software support.

The primary distinction between the Xiaomi 13T and the Xiaomi 13T Pro lies in the System on Chip (SoC). While the flagship Xiaomi 13T Pro employs the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, the Xiaomi 13T utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, positioning it slightly below the flagship level in terms of performance. Charging speed is also slightly more relaxed, with the Xiaomi 13T charging at a maximum of 67 watts, in contrast to the Xiaomi 13T Pro’s faster 120-watt charging capability.

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, 2880Hz PWM-Dimming, 480Hz touch sampling rate, up to 1200 nits in high brightness mode, 2600 nits max brightness, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 

, 256GB, 221.6 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, 360° Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, Linear motor, IR blaster, Flicker sensor, Color sensor, eSIM, 2×2 MIMO, Wi‑Fi Direct, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/66), 5G (Band n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78); Head SAR 0,991 W/kg, Body SAR 0.994 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.49 x 162.2 x 75.7 ( = 0.33 x 6.39 x 2.98 in)

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX707, OIS, AF, f/1.9, 24mm, 1.22µm, 1/1.28″) + 50MP telefoto camera (Omnivision OV50D, AF, 2x optical zoom, 20x digital zoom, f/1.9, 50mm, 0.61µm, 1/2.88″) + 12MP ultrawide camera (FF, f/2.2, 15mm, 1.12µm, 1/3.06″), videos up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, 0.8µm, 78° FOV, videos up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speaker with Dolby Atmos support, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB Type-C cable, SIM eject tool, Protective Case, Quick start guide, warranty card, safety information, MIUI 14, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof

Weight

197 g ( = 6.95 oz / 0.43 pounds), Power Supply: 100 g ( = 3.53 oz / 0.22 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Rating

Date

Model

Weight

Drive

Size

Resolution

Best Price

87.7 %

12/2023

Xiaomi 13T
Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6
197 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.67″ 2712×1220
88.9 %

11/2023

Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
187 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.20″ 2400×1080
90.5 %

03/2023

Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
167 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.10″ 2340×1080
83.1 %

09/2023

Sony Xperia 10 V
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
159 g 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.10″ 2520×1080
88.1 %

10/2023

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11
206 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.67″ 2712×1220
86.8 %

09/2023

Xiaomi Poco F5
SD 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725
181 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.67″ 2400×1080

The Xiaomi 13T adheres to the design language of its predecessors, featuring narrow display edges, rounded corners and edges, a punch-hole selfie camera, and impeccable finishing. This design is consistent with its sister model, the Xiaomi 13T Pro. The front of the device is protected by a layer of Gorilla Glass 5, safeguarding the 6.67-inch AMOLED display. While the display-to-surface ratio stands at a respectable 87%, it falls slightly short of the Xiaomi 13T Pro (89.2%) and some other flagship smartphones.

As an IP68-certified device, the Xiaomi 13T is available in three color variants. The black (Black) and green (Meadow Green) options feature a glossy glass back, prone to fingerprints. Opting for the blue variant, known as Alpine Blue, results in a back cover made of artificial leather. This choice has a minimal impact on the dimensions and weight. With the glass back, the Xiaomi weighs only 0.43 lb.

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_341352’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_342308’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_342308’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_338005’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_338005’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_338988’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_338988’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_341849’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_341849’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335208’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335208’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌

162.2 mm / 6.39 inch 75.7 mm / 2.98 inch 8.62 mm / 0.3394 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs162.2 mm / 6.39 inch 75.7 mm / 2.98 inch 8.49 mm / 0.3343 inch 197 g0.4343 lbs161.11 mm / 6.34 inch 74.95 mm / 2.95 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 181 g0.399 lbs155 mm / 6.1 inch 68 mm / 2.68 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 159 g0.3505 lbs150.5 mm / 5.93 inch 70.8 mm / 2.79 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 187 g0.4123 lbs146.3 mm / 5.76 inch 70.9 mm / 2.79 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 167 g0.3682 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

The Xiaomi 13T is exclusively available in a single memory variant, featuring 8 GB LPDDR5 RAM and 256 GB UFS 3.1 storage. Its comprehensive set of features includes Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, an OTG-capable USB-C port, and an always-on display. Additionally, the device is equipped with an IR blaster for convenient remote control of compatible devices such as televisions.

It’s worth noting that the Xiaomi 13T’s USB-C port, while versatile, doesn’t fully align with the smartphone’s premium-class positioning, as it operates internally at USB 2.0 speed. In a copy test using the M.2 SSD Samsung 980 Pro in the Asus ROG Strix Arion Case, the USB port achieves a relatively low transfer rate of 41.4 MB/s. This is a characteristic shared with the Xiaomi 13T Pro, which also features USB-C 2.0.

The Xiaomi 13T operates on Android 13, complemented by Xiaomi’s proprietary MIUI 14 user interface. The software suite includes several third-party applications such as LinkedIn, Facebook, Snapchat, and TikTok, all of which can be uninstalled to tailor the device to individual preferences. Following the setup process, approximately 222 GB of the 256 GB storage on our test device remains available.

One notable aspect is Xiaomi’s commitment to a lengthy update period for the Xiaomi 13T. Similar to the Xiaomi 13T Pro, the test candidate is promised 4 Android OS updates and will receive Android security patches for 5 years. This extended software support places Xiaomi in line with Samsung, providing buyers with added planning security.

The smartphone delivers reliable Wi-Fi performance with its support for WiFi 6. When connected to our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, the smartphone achieves peak speeds of around 920 MBit/s in both transmit and receive directions. The transmissions exhibit stability, with minor drops observed only during data transmission. For users seeking even higher Wi-Fi speeds, considering the Xiaomi 13T Pro, which supports Wi-Fi 7, may be a preferable option.

In terms of mobile network connectivity, the Xiaomi 13T supports 5G, albeit without mmWave. Its frequency capabilities cover all essential bands for 4G in Europe. This suggests that the Xiaomi 13T should also offer good reception in non-EU countries.

Networking
Xiaomi 13T
iperf3 receive AXE11000




920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼55%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




919 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼53%

Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000




891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz




1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼85%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz




1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼90%

Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000




1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz




1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼97%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz




1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼94%

Sony Xperia 10 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000




347 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼21%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




363 (min: 180) MBit/s ∼21%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000




968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼58%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼56%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz




1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz




1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Poco F5
iperf3 receive AXE11000




686 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼41%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




662 (min: 93) MBit/s ∼38%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz




1694 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz




1484 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼88%

Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000





626 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000





661 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼38%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1516 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1371 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼81%

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1826 (934-1883)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1654-1717)

Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (904-931)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (948-979)

Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (493-1010)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (494-1008)

It utilizes dual-band GNSS for accurate positioning. It supports various satellite navigation services, including GPS (L1, L5), Galileo (E1, E5a), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), and QZSS (L1, L5). Whether indoors or outdoors, the smartphone rapidly acquires a positioning signal in tests, determining the user’s location with an impressive accuracy of up to 1 meter.

In a practical test during a bike ride, the Xiaomi 13T demonstrated its excellent location capabilities when compared to the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch. The results were convincing, showcasing the smartphone’s precise tracking of the distance traveled, making it well-suited for everyday navigation tasks.

The phone provides dual SIM functionality along with the option to substitute one of the two nano SIM cards with an eSIM. It supports VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and Wi-Fi calls, offering versatile connectivity options.

In terms of voice quality, the Xiaomi smartphone performs admirably. During calls to both mobile and landline networks, voices are transmitted with clarity and distinction, even in hands-free mode. Additionally, the device’s noise suppression feature works reliably, contributing to an overall positive calling experience.

Recording with the selfie camera
Recording with the selfie camera

Compared to its predecessor, the Xiaomi 12T, Xiaomi has elevated the camera setup on the 13T in collaboration with Leica. This upgrade not only involves a partnership with Leica but also results in a more cohesive overall system. Like the Xiaomi 12T, the Xiaomi 13T features a triple camera setup at the rear. The 2 MP macro camera from its predecessor, which wasn’t particularly practical, has been omitted. Instead, the Xiaomi 13T now shares an identical camera setup with the Xiaomi 13T Pro.

The primary camera on the Xiaomi 13T is the 50 MP Sony IMX707 (f/1.9, 24 mm), equipped with optical image stabilization, and bears the Leica Vario-Summicron 1:19-2.2/15-50 ASPH branding on the back of the smartphone. Additionally, there is a 12 MP ultra-wide-angle camera (Omnivision OV13b, f/2.2, 15 mm), and as a notable feature, a 50 MP telephoto camera with a 2x optical zoom and a 20x digital zoom (Omnivision OV50D, f/1.9, 50 mm). The camera array is completed by the 20 MP punch-hole selfie camera, capable of capturing good photos but limited to recording videos in Full HD resolution at 30 frames per second.

The collaboration with Leica introduces two image modes, Leica Vivid and Leica Authentic, along with numerous photo setting options. These modes, accessible via a separate icon in the camera app, each feature slightly different color calibrations. Additionally, various Leica filters are available to enhance photos. The main camera can record videos at up to 4K at 30 frames per second.

In daylight conditions, the main camera excels at capturing excellent photos with minimal image noise, consistently maintaining sharpness thanks to optical image stabilization. The Leica Vivid mode produces strong contrasts, while Leica Authentic tends to provide softer contrasts. The main camera also performs well in capturing night shots. However, compared to the Xiaomi 13T Pro, which shares the same photo hardware, the level of detail is somewhat lower, and the photos appear less dynamic. This difference could be attributed to the distinct SoC (Xiaomi 13T Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+).

The telephoto camera, also boasting a 50 MP resolution, delivers high-contrast and sharp photos at lossless zoom levels of up to 2x, demonstrating an overall commendable performance. Images get hazy rapidly while using digital zoom. The weakest link in the Xiaomi 13T’s camera ensemble is the 12 MP ultra-wide-angle camera. While it performs adequately, it doesn’t offer more than standard photo quality, comparable to that of much more affordable smartphones.

Under controlled lighting conditions, the main camera demonstrates a commendable imaging performance. The Delta-E color deviations, reaching up to 21.23, are relatively significant. In particular, green tones are occasionally rendered much brighter than the reference colors of the ColorChecker color chart. Despite having only 1 lux of residual light, the Xiaomi 13T is still able to display the test chart, albeit with a noticeable level of blurring.

ColorChecker

11.6 ∆E

8.3 ∆E

15.4 ∆E

21.2 ∆E

13.5 ∆E

8.9 ∆E

4.9 ∆E

15.3 ∆E

12 ∆E

9.7 ∆E

8.7 ∆E

9.2 ∆E

9.9 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

13.7 ∆E

4 ∆E

9.7 ∆E

13 ∆E

6.3 ∆E

6.1 ∆E

9.2 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

2.6 ∆E

4.8 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi 13T: 9.99 ∆E min: 2.55 – max: 21.23 ∆E
ColorChecker

24 ∆E

29.1 ∆E

23.7 ∆E

26.6 ∆E

28.2 ∆E

36.4 ∆E

23.4 ∆E

15.3 ∆E

15.5 ∆E

22.9 ∆E

40 ∆E

40.6 ∆E

13.2 ∆E

28.1 ∆E

12.3 ∆E

27.1 ∆E

23.2 ∆E

26.1 ∆E

25.2 ∆E

27.9 ∆E

36 ∆E

30.6 ∆E

22.7 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi 13T: 25.47 ∆E min: 12.31 – max: 40.56 ∆E
The included 67 watt power supply.
The included 67 watt power supply.

The Xiaomi 13T comes with a 67-watt power adapter (5-20V/6.2-3.25A), a USB-C cable, a transparent protective cover, a SIM tool, a quick start guide.

Unfortunately, there is no warranty coverage in the US.

With a refresh rate reaching up to 144 Hz and a dynamically adjusted sampling rate of up to 480 Hz depending on the content, the Xiaomi 13T delivers an exceptionally smooth content display. The device exhibits no noticeable delay between input and response, ensuring swift app switching, even with multiple applications open simultaneously.

Biometric authentication is facilitated through the optical fingerprint reader integrated into the display, offering quick and reliable performance. Additionally, 2D facial recognition is available for authentication, providing a rapid but less secure alternative.

Subpixel
Subpixel

The Xiaomi 13T features a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 2712 x 1220 pixels, resulting in a 20:9 aspect ratio and a high pixel density of 446 PPI. The panel supports HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision.

The display operates with a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, dynamically adjusting in 5 steps. When set to 60 Hz in the Android settings, the screen runs at 30 or 60 Hz based on the displayed content. The alternative option is 144 Hz, utilizing all 5 levels at 30, 60, 90, 120, or 144 Hz.

Xiaomi claims a typical brightness of 1200 cd/m², with the ability to peak at 2600 cd/m². In a measurement with an even distribution of bright and dark image areas (APL18), the AMOLED display achieves an impressive 1452 cd/m², making it one of the brightest smartphone displays currently available. With HDR content, the screen reaches a maximum of 1278 cd/m², falling short of the targeted maximum value.

The display uses pulse width modulation (PWM) for screen brightness control, indicating that screen flickering is unavoidable. The amplitude curve is consistent at 120 Hz across the entire brightness spectrum. Xiaomi states that the 13T utilizes PWM dimming at a very high frequency of 2880 Hz, offering a more comfortable experience for sensitive users.

1197
cd/m²
1269
cd/m²
1276
cd/m²
1270
cd/m²
1254
cd/m²
1274
cd/m²
1253
cd/m²
1181
cd/m²
1273
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1276 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1249.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1254 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21

Xiaomi 13T
AMOLED, 2712×1220, 6.67
Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.20
Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340×1080, 6.10
Sony Xperia 10 V
OLED, 2520×1080, 6.10
Xiaomi 13T Pro
AMOLED, 2712×1220, 6.67
Xiaomi Poco F5
AMOLED, 2400×1080, 6.67
Screen

-39%

-113%

-21%

-41%

-69%

Brightness middle

1254

1450

16%

1125

-10%

933

-26%

1252

0%

1034

-18%

Brightness

1250

1410

13%

1122

-10%

944

-24%

1230

-2%

1033

-17%

Brightness Distribution

93

92

-1%

96

3%

97

4%

96

3%

93

0%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

0.8

1.1

-38%

3.2

-300%

1.1

-38%

1.4

-75%

1.9

-138%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

1.6

4.2

-163%

4.9

-206%

1.7

-6%

3.1

-94%

3.7

-131%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.3

2.1

-62%

3.3

-154%

1.8

-38%

2.3

-77%

2.7

-108%

Gamma

2.21 100%

2.24 98%

1.97 112%

2.29 96%

2.23 99%

2.24 98%

CCT

6350 102%

6584 99%

6504 100%

6611 98%

6590 99%

6917 94%

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18683 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The AMOLED display of the Xiaomi 13T is finely calibrated at the factory. Transitioning from the default Vivid color scheme to the Original Color (the third option being Saturated), ensures that colors and grayscale are within the optimal range. For users who prefer the Vivid and Saturated color modes, there is the additional option to customize the color display by selecting the desired color temperature.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
1.14 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.571 ms rise
↘ 0.527 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.27 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6655 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms).

The AMOLED display, known for its stable viewing angles, performs exceptionally well outdoors. Its high brightness reserves allow for easy readability of content even in direct sunlight. Additionally, a sunlight mode is available, adjusting the brightness in response to strong ambient light to further enhance visibility.

Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

The MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, an advanced CPU specifically designed for Xiaomi with an enhanced camera ISP, is a variation of the otherwise identical MediaTek Dimensity 8200 and is the processor used in the Xiaomi 13T. An Imagiq 785 image processor handles the processing of camera data.

Manufactured using a 4 nm process, the MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra features eight cores divided into two clusters. The first cluster comprises an ARM Cortex-A78 performance core clocked at 3.1 GHz, along with three additional ARM Cortex-A78 performance cores operating at 3 GHz. The second cluster houses four ARM Cortex-A55 power cores running at 2.0 GHz.

While the Xiaomi 13T may not match the SoC performance of its sister model, the Xiaomi 13T Pro, it still demonstrates commendable synthetic benchmark results. The Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra performs similarly well to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, found in devices like the Xiaomi Poco F5. The Google Tensor G3 in the Google Pixel 8 also achieves a comparable level of performance.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1549 Points +52%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


1502 Points +48%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


1260 Points +24%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


1225 Points +20%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


1018 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





1018 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (119 – 2138, n=220, last 2 years)





856 Points -16%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


669 Points -34%

Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


4974 Points +30%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


4793 Points +25%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


3948 Points +3%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


3833 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





3833 Points 0%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


3395 Points -11%

Average of class Smartphone
  (473 – 5538, n=220, last 2 years)





2738 Points -29%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1921 Points -50%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1984 Points +58%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


1687 Points +35%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


1653 Points +32%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


1491 Points +19%

Average of class Smartphone
  (193 – 2930, n=60, last 2 years)





1336 Points +7%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


1252 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





1252 Points 0%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


904 Points -28%

Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


5149 Points +28%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


4378 Points +9%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


4225 Points +5%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


4034 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





4034 Points 0%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


3787 Points -6%

Average of class Smartphone
  (845 – 7244, n=60, last 2 years)





3510 Points -13%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


2111 Points -48%

Antutu v9 – Total Score
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


1478071 Points +64%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1134684 Points +26%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


1115567 Points +24%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


903102 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





903102 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 – 1478071, n=158, last 2 years)





704441 Points -22%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


603046 Points -33%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


391186 Points -57%

Antutu v10 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1508318 Points +59%

Average of class Smartphone
  (461567 – 1562239, n=16, last 2 years)





1141004 Points +20%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


1107295 Points +17%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


947949 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





947949 Points 0%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


15270 Points +9%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


14143 Points +1%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


13966 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





13966 Points 0%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


13573 Points -3%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 – 19783, n=213, last 2 years)





11075 Points -21%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


10897 Points -22%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


7933 Points -43%

CrossMark – Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1221 Points +40%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


955 Points +10%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


941 Points +8%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


872 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





872 Points 0%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


817 Points -6%

Average of class Smartphone
  (200 – 1408, n=156, last 2 years)





803 Points -8%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


597 Points -32%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


8893 Points +49%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


8830 Points +48%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


5971 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





5971 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (411 – 9730, n=155, last 2 years)





5339 Points -11%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


5089 Points -15%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3655 Points -39%

System
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


14401 Points +23%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


13985 Points +19%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


11727 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





11727 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 – 15148, n=155, last 2 years)





9124 Points -22%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


7953 Points -32%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


7446 Points -37%

Memory
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


9598 Points +52%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


8871 Points +41%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


6298 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





6298 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (670 – 11617, n=155, last 2 years)





5794 Points -8%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


4374 Points -31%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


4146 Points -34%

Graphics
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


26849 Points +142%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


26748 Points +141%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


15847 Points +43%

Average of class Smartphone
  (697 – 32002, n=155, last 2 years)





12219 Points +10%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


11101 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





11101 Points 0%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


4376 Points -61%

Web
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


1785 Points +15%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1779 Points +15%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


1550 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





1550 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (10 – 2044, n=155, last 2 years)





1461 Points -6%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


1384 Points -11%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1237 Points -20%

UL Procyon AI Inference – Overall Score
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


44231 Points +68%

Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


26303 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





26303 Points 0%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


25563 Points -3%

Average of class Smartphone
  (207 – 84787, n=128, last 2 years)





22490 Points -14%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


16702 Points -37%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


10511 Points -60%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


5442 Points -79%

AImark – Score v3.x
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192


22237 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 





22237 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (298 – 128240, n=79, last 2 years)





12419 Points -44%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192


1320 Points -94%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192


1189 Points -95%

Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


1136 Points -95%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


445 Points -98%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288


Points -100%

For graphics calculations, the Xiaomi 13T uses the ARM GPU Mali-G610 MP6, providing the smartphone with a respectable graphics performance. Although, it doesn’t secure a top-ranking position among the compared devices. While the Xiaomi 13T outperforms the Sony Xperia 10 V, it falls just short of reaching the performance levels of the Xiaomi Poco F5 and the Google Pixel 8.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


3699 Points +119%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


3011 Points +78%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


2439 Points +44%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1968 Points +16%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1690 Points

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


353 Points -79%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


3857 Points +124%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


3067 Points +78%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


2422 Points +40%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1984 Points +15%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1725 Points

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


358 Points -79%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


13911 Points +116%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


11678 Points +81%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


8977 Points +39%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


7701 Points +20%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


6439 Points

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1198 Points -81%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


6185 Points +2%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


6043 Points

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


4995 Points -17%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


4985 Points -18%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


3982 Points -34%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3512 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


21767 Points +116%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


19231 Points +91%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


14801 Points +47%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


13546 Points +35%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


10067 Points

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2990 Points -70%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


13955 Points +59%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


10301 Points +17%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


10274 Points +17%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


9813 Points +12%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


8769 Points

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3092 Points -65%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


59 fps -51%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


504 fps +92%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


459 fps +75%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


359 fps +37%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


317 fps +21%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


262 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


93 fps -65%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps +15%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps +15%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


119 fps +14%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


104 fps

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


78 fps -25%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


39 fps -62%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


299 fps +90%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


271 fps +73%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


232 fps +48%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


157 fps

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


97 fps -38%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


47 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps +71%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps +71%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


115 fps +64%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


70 fps

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


65 fps -7%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


26 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


193 fps +93%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


186 fps +86%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


137 fps +37%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


100 fps

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


92 fps -8%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


34 fps -66%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


109 fps +187%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


81 fps +113%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


68 fps +79%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


58 fps +53%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


38 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


16 fps -58%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


123 fps +141%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


103 fps +102%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


79 fps +55%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


74 fps +45%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


51 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


20 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


98 fps +227%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


69 fps +130%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


56 fps +87%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


49 fps +63%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


30 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


11 fps -63%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


63 fps +163%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


58 fps +142%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


37 fps +54%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


34 fps +42%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


24 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


8.1 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps +161%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


81 fps +76%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


78 fps +70%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


75 fps +63%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


46 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


18 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


141 fps +124%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


136 fps +116%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


99 fps +57%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


63 fps

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


35 fps -44%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


22 fps -65%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


30 fps +173%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


27 fps +145%

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


16 fps +45%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


16 fps +45%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


11 fps

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3.6 fps -67%

Browser benchmarks reveal the Xiaomi 13T’s impressive performance, garnering it a good middle-of-the-road place among the selected comparison devices. The smartphone has quick web page loading times and responsive display performance. 

Jetstream 2 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)


158.595 Points +65%

Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)


136.736 Points +42%

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)


126.392 Points +31%

Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)


104.25 Points +8%

Average of class Smartphone (21.2 – 351, n=165, last 2 years)





98 Points +2%

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra





96.2 Points 0%

Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)


96.176 Points

Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)


78.167 Points -19%

Speedometer 2.0 – Result
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)


176 runs/min +57%

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)


136 runs/min +21%

Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)


136 runs/min +21%

Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)


112 runs/min

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra





112 runs/min 0%

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)


108 runs/min -4%

Average of class Smartphone (14.9 – 445, n=153, last 2 years)





94.4 runs/min -16%

Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)


72 runs/min -36%

WebXPRT 4 – Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)


146 Points +36%

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)


107 Points 0%

Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)


107 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra





107 Points 0%

Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)


95 Points -11%

Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)


94 Points -12%

Average of class Smartphone (25 – 202, n=125, last 2 years)





92.7 Points -13%

Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)


67 Points -37%

WebXPRT 3 – —
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)


143 Points +16%

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)


134 Points +9%

Average of class Smartphone (37 – 304, n=130, last 2 years)





123.7 Points +1%

Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)


123 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra





123 Points 0%

Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)


115 Points -7%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)


59913 Points +42%

Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)


47776 Points +13%

Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)


42222 Points

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra





42222 Points 0%

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)


37823 Points -10%

Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)


36482 Points -14%

Average of class Smartphone (4633 – 89112, n=198, last 2 years)





31654 Points -25%

Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)


28902 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (388 – 9999, n=163, last 2 years)





1753 ms * -42%

Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)


1388 ms * -13%

Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra





1233 ms * -0%

Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)


1232.9 ms *

Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)


1143.43 ms * +7%

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)


1021.2 ms * +17%

Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)


998 ms * +19%

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)


701.7 ms * +43%

* … smaller is better

Benefiting from its UFS 3.1 flash, the Xiaomi 13T achieves impressive storage speeds, resulting in short loading times. Notably, it closely approaches the performance of the Xiaomi 13T Pro when it comes to reading and writing small data blocks.

Xiaomi 13T Samsung Galaxy S23 Sony Xperia 10 V Xiaomi 13T Pro Xiaomi Poco F5 Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-24%

-67%

60%

2%

-25%

-42%

Sequential Read 256KB

1861.15

3133.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 4.0)

68%

1686.71 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 3.1)

-9%

444.54

-76%

3983.36

114%

1798.37

-3%

1764 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1004 – 2037, n=83)

-5%

1281 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(215 – 4512, n=217, last 2 years)

-31%

Sequential Write 256KB

1766.12

844 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 4.0)

-52%

628.53 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 3.1)

-64%

438.02

-75%

3201.74

81%

1736.41

-2%

1131 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(452 – 1873, n=83)

-36%

899 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(57.5 – 3202, n=217, last 2 years)

-49%

Random Read 4KB

380.76

427.61 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 4.0)

12%

343.65 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 3.1)

-10%

175.72

-54%

434.21

14%

389.37

2%

282 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(173.5 – 543, n=83)

-26%

225 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(22.2 – 543, n=217, last 2 years)

-41%

Random Write 4KB

452.08

156.69 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 4.0)

-65%

130.26 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(UFS 3.1)

-71%

165.15

-63%

583.6

29%

498.93

10%

311 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(197.5 – 499, n=84)

-31%

238 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13 – 584, n=218, last 2 years)

-47%

With the ARM Mali-G610 MP6 and 8 GB LPDDR5 RAM, the Xiaomi 13T handles games with minimal restrictions. The main limitations observed were within the games themselves during testing.

In games like PUBG Mobile (in the HD/Extrem) and Asphalt 9 (in the high setting), the image output is capped at a maximum of 60 FPS, likely for energy-saving purposes. However, the Xiaomi 13T consistently maintains the frame rate at a practically constant 60 FPS in both cases, indicating that higher performance is achievable.

Even in the UltraHDR/Ultra-setting of PUBG Mobile, the Xiaomi 13T maintains an average of 40 FPS. Notably, in our third test game, Subway Surfers, where there is no frame limit, the smartphone fully leverages its 120 Hz screen.

The determination of game frame rates is conducted using our Gamebench test tool.

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip

Xiaomi 13T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.3.3a: Ø59.4 (51-61)

Xiaomi 13T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø59.3 (57-61)

Xiaomi 13T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.9.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

Xiaomi 13T; Subway Surfers; 3.20.0: Ø118.4 (111-121)

During testing, the Xiaomi 13T reached a temperature of 107.42 °F under load. This temperature is entirely benign and doesn’t result in the smartphone feeling uncomfortably warm when held.

Efficient heat dissipation is demonstrated by the Xiaomi 13T, as evidenced by the 3DMark’s Wild Life stress test. After 20 runs, the test scene is only rendered around 10 percent slower than at the beginning of the measurement, even in the demanding Wild Life Extreme scenario. This suggests that the smartphone can maintain at least 90% of its performance under constant high load.

  40.9 °C
106 F
41.6 °C
107 F
40.9 °C
106 F
 
  41.8 °C
107 F
41.9 °C
107 F
41.2 °C
106 F
 
  41.8 °C
107 F
41.9 °C
107 F
41.2 °C
106 F
 
Maximum: 41.9 °C = 107 F
Average: 41.5 °C = 107 F
35.9 °C
97 F
38.8 °C
102 F
37.7 °C
100 F
36.2 °C
97 F
38.2 °C
101 F
40.2 °C
104 F
37.3 °C
99 F
39.1 °C
102 F
40.7 °C
105 F
Maximum: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Average: 38.2 °C = 101 F

Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C = 81 F | Room Temperature 21.1 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99.7 % +9%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


91.4 %

Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


85.8 % -6%

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


83.4 % -9%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


74.2 % -19%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


68.6 % -25%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


99.7 % +11%

Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99.2 % +10%

Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


90.2 %

Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


79 % -12%

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


76.7 % -15%

Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


53.8 % -40%

Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


86.3 %

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip

Xiaomi 13T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.63 (9.32-10.3)

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.7 (11.3-14.4)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)

Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.8 (16.9-22)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.7 (11.7-11.8)

Xiaomi 13T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.9 (35.4-38.7)

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.6 (43.2-51.8)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)

Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.22)

Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57 (48.3-65.1)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.9 (39.1-45.6)

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (39.7-46.1)

Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.1 (16.8-19.4)

The stereo speakers of the Xiaomi 13T are located on the two short sides of the casing and deliver a relatively balanced sound by smartphone standards. Bass is practically absent from the sound mix, but apart from that, the smartphone produces decent sound with mostly balanced highs and mids.

External audio devices can be connected via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.4. The Xiaomi 13T supports all important Bluetooth codecs, including AAC, SBC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, and LHDC V1 to V5.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.22529.630.63123.736.54035.631.75038.637.96324.236.38018.938.710018.942.412515.741.516013.950.320014.752.925015.257.831512.963.640011.463.350012.768.163012.268.680011.573.5100011.677.5125013.678.5160012.876.720001379.8250012.780.3315012.780.4400012.983.8500013.482.1630013.480.2800013.977.71000013.672.41250013.671.11600013.765.5SPL25.191.4N0.687.2median 13.4median 73.5Delta0.78.839.435.732.532.120.830.527.325.934.433.824.633.62031.320.129.816.133.517.545.11547.716.358.213.3591460.212.765.813.869.513.671.413.173.613.776.812.874.613.577.213.978.61380.313.482.613.678.213.778.613.478.413.575.113.965.913.360.525.689.70.779.6median 13.6median 73.60.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

The smartphone can be charged with up to 67 watts, officially completing the charging of its 5000 mAh battery in 42 minutes. During the test, the stopwatch even stops at 41 minutes. A suitable 67-watt power adapter is conveniently included with the phone. The Xiaomi 13T does not support wireless charging or reverse wireless charging.

In terms of power consumption, the Xiaomi 13T is almost completely inconspicuous in the test. The high consumption of 13.2 watts under load is due to the enormously demanding burnout benchmark. The Xiaomi Poco F5 and the Xiaomi 13T Pro even provoke a slightly higher power consumption.

Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption

27%

49%

43%

1%

9%

0%

17%

Idle Minimum *

1.13

0.56

50%

0.57

50%

0.56

50%

0.99

12%

0.89

21%

1.13

-0%

0.89 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.44 – 2.37, n=155, last 2 years)

21%

Idle Average *

1.37

1.08

21%

0.74

46%

0.91

34%

1.14

17%

1.05

23%

1.37

-0%

1.464 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.69 – 4.26, n=155, last 2 years)

-7%

Idle Maximum *

1.42

1.17

18%

0.83

42%

0.98

31%

1.34

6%

1.08

24%

1.42

-0%

1.669 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.79 – 4.45, n=155, last 2 years)

-18%

Load Average *

8.98

8.01

11%

4.26

53%

5.34

41%

10.06

-12%

10.86

-21%

8.98

-0%

4.84 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(2.4 – 15.3, n=155, last 2 years)

46%

Load Maximum *

13.23

8.89

33%

6.16

53%

5.46

59%

15.94

-20%

13.49

-2%

13.2

-0%

7.71 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3.85 – 17.8, n=155, last 2 years)

42%

* … smaller is better

01234567891011121314Tooltip

Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.46 (1.205-10.9)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.57 (0.819-10.1)

Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.997 (0.937-1.285)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)

012345678910111213Tooltip

Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.65 (4.67-7.07)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.27 (5.86-6.72)

Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.997 (0.937-1.285)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)

We conducted practical measurements of battery life with the screen brightness adjusted to 150 cd/m². The Xiaomi 13T performs well with the 144 Hz display enabled. In the WLAN test, it lasts just over 17 hours, and just under 15 minutes more during continuous video playback. The comparison devices are on a similar level, with the exception of the Sony Xperia 10 V, which demonstrates true endurance qualities.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) 41h 51min
WiFi Websurfing 17h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p 17h 20min
Load (maximum brightness) 4h 07min

Pros

+ high-quality and waterproof housing

+ ultra-bright AMOLED display with 144 Hz

+ good camera system

+ high performance

+ extended update period

+ fast charging with 67 watts

Cons

USB-C 2.0 only

no wireless charging

only one memory variant, not expandable

Anyone who has waited until now to purchase a new smartphone might find the perfect fit in Xiaomi’s lineup. The T series, released towards the year’s end, consistently delivers models with impressive performance and features at a comparatively reasonable price. The Xiaomi 13T, while not a budget option at an official price of $599, is significantly more affordable than the current Xiaomi flagship models.

The Xiaomi 13T stands out as an excellent upper-class smartphone with extensive features, now available for less than $600.

Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, it offers performance just below flagship level, distinguishing it from the Xiaomi 13T Pro, and boasts faster charging at 120 watts. The Xiaomi 13T, with its 67-watt charging, reaches a full charge in just 41 minutes, although it lacks wireless charging functionality.

Impressive across various system components, the Xiaomi 13T particularly excels with its very bright AMOLED display. Noteworthy in its price range is the camera module, including a 2x telephoto lens. The extended 5-year update period might sway those who have been hesitant about choosing Xiaomi.

However, users with high storage needs may be disappointed, as the Xiaomi 13T offers only a 256 GB version without the option to expand storage using a microSD card. In this regard, the Xiaomi 13T Pro, available with up to 1 TB capacity, provides a better solution.

Alternative options to consider include the Samsung Galaxy S23 and the Xiaomi Poco F5. The former offers slightly superior speed and a more compact size at 6.1 inches. While the Xiaomi Poco F5 is more budget-friendly, it falls short in the camera department compared to the Xiaomi 13T.

The Xiaomi 13T is available on Amazon for under $500.

Xiaomi 13T

12/07/2023 v7

Manuel Masiero

Application Performance

86 / 90 → 96%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Manuel Masiero, 2023-12- 8 (Update: 2023-12- 9)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

OpenAI’s o3 shows remarkable progress on ARC-AGI, sparking debate on AI reasoning

December 24, 2024 11:40 AM Image created with DALL-E 3...

How Etermax took Trivia Crack World to Meta Quest VR headsets

December 24, 2024 8:00 AM Etermax has been making games...

My most anticipated games of 2025 | The DeanBeat

December 24, 2024 8:00 AM Metroid 4 Prime: BeyondImage Credit:...

Breakthrough T1D Play has raised $5M for diabetes research

December 24, 2024 7:30 AM Breakthrough T1D Play raises money...