Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro review

Date:

Full throttle! Nubia’s RedMagic series is synonymous with no-compromise performance, attractive design and useful gaming features. The RedMagic 9 Pro likewise stays true to this philosophy and once again features a built-in fan on board. Read our review to find out whether it is worth an upgrade.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zhiwei Zhuang), Published 🇩🇪

(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Display

6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, Capacitive, BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 

, 487.39 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, 520Hz touch sampling rate touchpads, OTG, Game Space Switch: Toggles special game mode on or off

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band C0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28A, 28B, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.98 x 76.35 ( = 0.35 x 6.46 x 3.01 in)

Battery

6500 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57″, OIS) 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, Samsung JN1, f/2.2, 0.64 µm) 2 MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 80W charger, clear case, USB Cable, SIM ejector tool, RedMagic OS 9.0, 12 Months Warranty, RGB light: fully customisable lighting effects; 20,000 RPM high-speed turbofan; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); HDR: HLG, HDR10; DRM Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

229 g ( = 8.08 oz / 0.5 pounds), Power Supply: 125 g ( = 4.41 oz / 0.28 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Bewertung

Datum

Modell

Gewicht

Laufwerk

Groesse

Aufloesung

Preis ab

86.8 %

02/2024

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
229 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.80″ 2480×1116
88.3 %

08/2023

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
228 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.80″ 2480×1116
87.4 %

01/2024

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.67″ 3200×1440
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
225 g 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″ 2400×1080

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is very angular and calls to mind the design of its predecessor. The device is well balanced and sits well in the hand despite being fairly heavy. It is available in the colourways Sleet (black), Cyclone (translucent back) and Snowfall (silver-white).

We like the 9 Pro’s built quality: all the gaps on the phone are small and even. It once again has a seamless display with the front camera hidden beneath the panel. The under-display camera is meanwhile virtually invisible and can only be located when you view it from certain angles with lots of light shining on the display. The rear cameras are flush with the phone’s body – something you don’t see often nowadays. They are likewise covered by an unspecified glass.

The gaming phone doesn’t have any IP certification, but the sealed SIM slot suggests that there is at least some basic protection against splashing water.

The phone is similar to its predecessor when it comes to features. On the right side of the phone, you’ll once again find two touch-sensitive dedicated triggers. They provide good haptic feedback and feel very responsive during gaming.

The integrated USB port not only delivers high data transfer speeds (copy test: 635.9 MB/s) but also supports video output via a cable. This means you can easily mirror the screen or load up a desktop version of RedMagic Game Space (up to Full HD and 144Hz).

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_339685’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_343088’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_343088’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_343653’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_343653’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_338006’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_338006’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌

163.98 mm / 6.46 inch 76.35 mm / 3.01 inch 9.47 mm / 0.3728 inch 228 g0.503 lbs163.98 mm / 6.46 inch 76.35 mm / 3.01 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 229 g0.505 lbs163.8 mm / 6.45 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 225 g0.496 lbs162.78 mm / 6.41 inch 75.44 mm / 2.97 inch 8.59 mm / 0.3382 inch 204 g0.4497 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro supports all conventional mobile communications standards with a wide frequency coverage. Wireless LAN connectivity is really snappy and stable with Wi-Fi 7 as well as in both the 5.0 GHz and 6.0 GHz range. 

The phone offers decent voice quality as long as you hold it to your ear. That said, noise suppression is average at best, and the RedMagic sounds slightly echoey in speaker mode.

For operating system, the phone comes with Android 14 with Nubia’s RedMagic OS 9.0 custom UI. At the time of review, the security patches were dated 1 November 2023 and thus no longer completely up to date. Based on experience, updates are only rolled out sporadically. Nubia has merely promised to provide one major update and two years of security patches.

Biometric security is handled by an in-display optical fingerprint scanner that does its job adequately and can measure heart rate to boot. Alternatively or additionally, you can use facial recognition via the front camera, but this method is less secure.

Apart from the two extra capacitive shoulder triggers, there is a striking, red button built into the frame that lets you switch to a special gaming interface on the phone: the RedMagic Game Space. It lets users customise settings for individual games and manage any paired accessories.

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1688 (829-1880)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1577-1828)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (654-1703)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (659-1568)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1500-1710)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (767-825)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1801 (1553-1882)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (475-989)

Selfie taken with the RedMagic 9 Pro
Selfie taken with the RedMagic 9 Pro

Nothing much has changed with the front camera. The under-display camera has a beauty mode at its disposal, but images still look muddy and lack detail even when this function is disabled. Pictures also quickly become extremely noisy in low-light conditions.

The main camera module now has one lens fewer than its predecessor. The wide-angle sensor is identical to the one on the RedMagic 8S Pro but now has optical image stabilisation (OIS). The second lens has 50 MP as well and can be used to take both ultra-wide and macro images. Whilst lacking any optical zoom, the phone is capable of up to ten times digital zoom. Photos taken with the RedMagic 9 Pro have a nice level of detail but look somewhat washed-out and dull.

You can record videos at up to 8K (30 fps) with the main shooter and Full HD (30 fps) with the front camera.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light

click to load images

ColorChecker

11.4 ∆E

6 ∆E

5.4 ∆E

6.5 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

6.7 ∆E

8.3 ∆E

10.4 ∆E

7.7 ∆E

4.9 ∆E

2.7 ∆E

5.1 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

9.3 ∆E

9 ∆E

4.4 ∆E

5 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

1.2 ∆E

3.9 ∆E

2.2 ∆E

4 ∆E

8 ∆E

ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 6.42 ∆E min: 1.2 – max: 11.56 ∆E
ColorChecker

27.7 ∆E

46.9 ∆E

35.5 ∆E

33.4 ∆E

39.3 ∆E

54.3 ∆E

45.8 ∆E

29.8 ∆E

33.5 ∆E

26.2 ∆E

56.2 ∆E

56.2 ∆E

26.5 ∆E

43 ∆E

29 ∆E

64.3 ∆E

35.5 ∆E

38.8 ∆E

68.9 ∆E

64.5 ∆E

48.5 ∆E

35 ∆E

22.8 ∆E

12.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 40.61 ∆E min: 12.89 – max: 68.94 ∆E
Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

In terms of general specs, the display on the RedMagic 9 Pro remains unchanged from the previous generation: it’s a 6.8-inch Full HD+ panel capable of up to 120Hz refresh rate. Though colour accuracy and brightness have been further improved.

With the ambient light sensor enabled, the AMOLED display hit an average peak brightness of 1,031 cd/m² whilst showing a completely white image. When bright and dark areas are distributed evenly (APL 18), the panel even managed to get as bright as 1,242 cd/m². It also reached a similar level for HDR playback. The display has a manual max brightness of 589 cd/m².

Like all OLED panels, the screen on RedMagic 9 Pro isn’t spared from flickering either. That said, Nubia uses high-frequency PWM dimming at 2,160Hz to make the display as comfortable to the eye as possible.

1012
cd/m²
1023
cd/m²
1048
cd/m²
1017
cd/m²
1035
cd/m²
1054
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
1036
cd/m²
1042
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE Q9+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1054 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1030.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1035 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480×1116, 6.80
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
AMOLED, 2480×1116, 6.80
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.67
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.78
Response Times

-77%

20%

218%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *

0.8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.4015, 0.401)

2.06 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.027, 1.03)

-158%

1.09 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.527, 0.5615)

-36%

1.18 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.5235, 0.655)

-48%

Response Time Black / White *

1.08 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.539, 0.5365)

1.88 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.065, 0.819)

-74%

1.13 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.569, 0.559)

-5%

1.14 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.6525, 0.483)

-6%

PWM Frequency

60

60

0%

120.3

101%

485

708%

Screen

-21%

6%

-30%

Brightness middle

1035

775

-25%

1002

-3%

1699

64%

Brightness

1031

778

-25%

1004

-3%

1698

65%

Brightness Distribution

96

98

2%

95

-1%

98

2%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1

1.3

-30%

0.8

20%

1.9

-90%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

1.9

2.4

-26%

1.7

11%

4.7

-147%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.6

1.9

-19%

1.4

12%

2.8

-75%

Gamma

2.25 98%

2.28 96%

2.23 99%

2.26 97%

CCT

6368 102%

6693 97%

6468 100%

6648 98%

Total Average (Program / Settings)

-49% /
-39%

13% /
11%

94% /
53%

* … smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
1.08 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.539 ms rise
↘ 0.5365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.8 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.4015 ms rise
↘ 0.401 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18379 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is one of the first smartphones available globally to feature the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Thanks to the built-in fan, which runs even quieter (max. 39 dB(A)) than the one in the 8S Pro, the phone is able to keep the processor running stably at peak performance most of the time.

In our browser benchmarks, we noticed that the RedMagic phone and Chrome don’t play particularly well together. Results were surprisingly poor when Google’s browser was used. Things were different when we used Microsoft Edge, for example.

We ran the Burnout benchmark (CPU + GPU) to simulate a heavy load. The RedMagic 9 Pro crashed after about ten minutes and required a restart. The device overheated despite having a fan. Subsequent measurements were thus carried out with only CPU load enabled. Even so, the gaming phone became very hot.

The two speakers on the RedMagic 9 Pro can get really loud, but they already sound tinny and empty at moderate volume levels.

The Nubia phone truly shines when it comes to battery life. The battery has a whopping 6,500 mAh capacity and lasted an outstanding 17 hours in our Wi-Fi test.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


1687 Points +7%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


1672 Points +6%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1575 – 1702, n=6)





1662 Points +6%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


1575 Points

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


1574 Points 0%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


1266 Points -20%

Average of class Smartphone
  (119 – 2138, n=218, last 2 years)





905 Points -43%

Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


6439 Points +19%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


6415 Points +19%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 – 6543, n=6)





6209 Points +15%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


5393 Points

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


5129 Points -5%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


3965 Points -26%

Average of class Smartphone
  (473 – 6681, n=218, last 2 years)





2932 Points -46%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


2318 Points +2%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


2258 Points -1%

Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


2278 Points 0%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


2270 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (2127 – 2329, n=8)





2249 Points -1%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


2104 Points -7%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


1741 Points -23%

Average of class Smartphone
  (193 – 2930, n=79, last 2 years)





1455 Points -36%

Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


7357 Points +3%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


7193 Points +1%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


7151 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6765 – 7501, n=8)





7095 Points -1%

Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


6875 Points -4%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


5648 Points -21%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


4346 Points -39%

Average of class Smartphone
  (845 – 7408, n=79, last 2 years)





3976 Points -44%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


21385 Points +2%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


20943 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15876 – 21628, n=6)





19316 Points -8%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


17399 Points -17%

Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


15876 Points -24%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


15774 Points -25%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 – 21385, n=211, last 2 years)





11535 Points -45%

Antutu v10 – Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


2162423 Points 0%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


2157865 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1905751 – 2162423, n=6)





2074885 Points -4%

Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


1905751 Points -12%

Average of class Smartphone
  (461567 – 2162423, n=31, last 2 years)





1326858 Points -39%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


1308217 Points -39%

3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


19690 Points +1%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


19566 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (19319 – 19690, n=4)





19554 Points 0%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


14737 Points -25%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


8294 Points -58%

Average of class Smartphone
  (392 – 20068, n=200, last 2 years)





5970 Points -69%

Wild Life Extreme
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


5226 Points +2%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


5143 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4744 – 5338, n=5)





5132 Points 0%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


3935 Points -23%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


2121 Points -59%

Average of class Smartphone
  (22 – 5226, n=205, last 2 years)





1599 Points -69%

Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


5185 Points +1%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


5150 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4729 – 5185, n=4)





5060 Points -2%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


3900 Points -24%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


2079 Points -60%

Average of class Smartphone
  (109 – 5248, n=198, last 2 years)





1610 Points -69%

Solar Bay Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


8648 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8547 – 8720, n=3)





8638 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (3332 – 8720, n=19, last 2 years)





5777 Points -33%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


5700 Points -34%

Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8668 – 8758, n=2)





8713 Points +1%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


8668 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (3229 – 8758, n=19, last 2 years)





5707 Points -34%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


5669 Points -35%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


109 fps +82%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


101 fps +68%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (60 – 121, n=6)





88.5 fps +48%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


61 fps +2%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


60 fps 0%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


60 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 – 123, n=225, last 2 years)





43.4 fps -28%

1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


209 fps +29%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (162 – 241, n=7)





208 fps +28%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


183 fps +13%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


165 fps +2%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


162 fps

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


126 fps -22%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 – 229, n=225, last 2 years)





62 fps -62%

on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


76 fps +27%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (60 – 93, n=6)





73.7 fps +23%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


63 fps +5%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


61 fps +2%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


60 fps 0%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


60 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 – 100, n=225, last 2 years)





32.1 fps -46%

2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


85 fps +33%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (64 – 96, n=8)





83 fps +30%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


72 fps +13%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


68 fps +6%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


64 fps

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


48 fps -25%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 – 94, n=225, last 2 years)





24.7 fps -61%

3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (37 – 42, n=6)





39.3 fps +3%

Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (vulkan 1.0)


39 fps +3%

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384


38 fps

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576


37 fps -3%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384


33 fps -13%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


22 fps -42%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 – 42, n=190, last 2 years)





12.2 fps -68%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Edge 120)


70135 Points

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Chrome 120)


25953 Points -63%

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 (Edge 121.0.2277.84)


63669 Points -9%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (25953 – 70135, n=6)





58482 Points -17%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)


55611 Points -21%

Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Chrome 120)


54365 Points -22%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Edge 115)


52492 Points -25%

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 115)


19870 Points -72%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4633 – 89112, n=202, last 2 years)





33542 Points -52%

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560×1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø58.9 (15.2-100.4)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø71.5 (17.9-136.2)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560×1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø13.9 (9.4-22)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø16.9 (10.9-48.7)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-19%

-42%

-3%

-12%

-61%

Sequential Read 256KB

4164.08

3576.35

-14%

1876.8

-55%

4016.67

-4%

3689 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3344 – 4512, n=12)

-11%

1394 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(215 – 4512, n=212, last 2 years)

-67%

Sequential Write 256KB

3199.98

2682.03

-16%

1773.94

-45%

3153.4

-1%

2940 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1891 – 3518, n=12)

-8%

1005 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(57.5 – 3518, n=212, last 2 years)

-69%

Random Read 4KB

442.82

369.76

-16%

342.04

-23%

434.63

-2%

419 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(268 – 480, n=12)

-5%

237 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(22.2 – 543, n=212, last 2 years)

-46%

Random Write 4KB

691.17

479.52

-31%

372.35

-46%

648

-6%

515 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(174.3 – 701, n=12)

-25%

255 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13 – 701, n=213, last 2 years)

-63%

  54.7 °C
130 F
54.2 °C
130 F
51.1 °C
124 F
 
  55 °C
131 F
55.1 °C
131 F
52.2 °C
126 F
 
  54.7 °C
130 F
53.9 °C
129 F
53.3 °C
128 F
 
Maximum: 55.1 °C = 131 F
Average: 53.8 °C = 129 F
45 °C
113 F
50 °C
122 F
49.1 °C
120 F
47.7 °C
118 F
48.5 °C
119 F
41.6 °C
107 F
48.3 °C
119 F
50.4 °C
123 F
51.6 °C
125 F
Maximum: 51.6 °C = 125 F
Average: 48 °C = 118 F

Power Supply (max.)  26.9 °C = 80 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø117.1 (117-117.1)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27 (24.8-28.8)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.638.42524.739.8312440.14024.641.45032.143.2632242.88016.441.31002644.712519.846.216015.651.320014.655.825011.159.53158.260.340011.565.65009.975.36308.477.580010.278.310001180.1125013.478.8160012.177.520001281.5250012.383.1315012.483.940001381.5500013.177630013.874.6800013.771.1100001470.71250013.765.51600012.853.4SPL24.791.7N0.689.1median 12.8median 75.3Delta1.510.528.636.125.934.523.435.627.335.936.238.725.44016.644.216.946.614.747.213.152.315.154.714.357.311.661.91061.19.167.611.168.79.173.111.875.81576.911.377.51281.212.383.212.784.912.683.813.179.713.47813.577.113.574.513.663.713.657.324.792.20.687.8median 13.1median 74.51.39.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120) 17h 16min

Pros

+ bright, accurate and fast display

+ high performance

+ additional touch sensors

+ long battery life

Cons

can get very hot

short update support period

no IP certification

no wireless charging

Review: Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro. The review unit is kindly provided by Nubia.  (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Review: Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro. The review unit is kindly provided by Nubia.

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is a minor step forward from its predecessor, the 8S Pro. Familiar highlights such as configurable LEDs and extra shoulder buttons are once again on board and essentially unchanged. Besides having the latest Qualcomm SoC, the gaming phone also offers a brighter display, a quieter fan and a larger battery. The new camera setup has been improved as well. Furthermore, the phone can now charge at up to 80 watts.

The RedMagic 9 Pro is a powerful gaming phone with a small price tag. But it can get very hot.

Though it’s nice that the fan now runs quieter, the cooling solution wasn’t enough to keep the phone from shutting down during our stress test. Nubia would do well to throttle the SoC slightly rather than going for all-out performance. Whilst overheating isn’t an issue when gaming, surface temperatures can run high.

A handful of features are also missing, such as wireless charging and IP certification, both of which can be overlooked given the product’s focus. However, a device in this price range should have eSIM support.

The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is the RedMagic 9 Pro’s toughest competitor. If you mostly care about performance, other high-end smartphones may likewise be great alternatives for you, not least the Nubia Z60 Ultra. 

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is available in three configurations: 

Colour RAM/Storage Price (RRP)
Sleet 12/256 GB €649/US$649
Cyclone 16/512 GB €799/US$799
Snowfall 16/512 GB €799/US$799

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro

02/05/2024 v7

Daniel Schmidt

Application Performance

96 / 90 → 100%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02- 6 (Update: 2024-02- 6)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related