Full throttle! Nubia’s RedMagic series is synonymous with no-compromise performance, attractive design and useful gaming features. The RedMagic 9 Pro likewise stays true to this philosophy and once again features a built-in fan on board. Read our review to find out whether it is worth an upgrade.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zhiwei Zhuang), Published 🇩🇪
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, Capacitive, BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB
, 487.39 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, 520Hz touch sampling rate touchpads, OTG, Game Space Switch: Toggles special game mode on or off
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band C0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28A, 28B, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.98 x 76.35 ( = 0.35 x 6.46 x 3.01 in)
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57″, OIS) 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, Samsung JN1, f/2.2, 0.64 µm) 2 MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 80W charger, clear case, USB Cable, SIM ejector tool, RedMagic OS 9.0, 12 Months Warranty, RGB light: fully customisable lighting effects; 20,000 RPM high-speed turbofan; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); HDR: HLG, HDR10; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
229 g ( = 8.08 oz / 0.5 pounds), Power Supply: 125 g ( = 4.41 oz / 0.28 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Bewertung |
Datum |
Modell |
Gewicht |
Laufwerk |
Groesse |
Aufloesung |
Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.8 % |
02/2024 |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 |
229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80″ | 2480×1116 | |
88.3 % |
08/2023 |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 |
228 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80″ | 2480×1116 | |
87.4 % |
01/2024 |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 |
204 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67″ | 3200×1440 | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 |
225 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78″ | 2400×1080 |
The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is very angular and calls to mind the design of its predecessor. The device is well balanced and sits well in the hand despite being fairly heavy. It is available in the colourways Sleet (black), Cyclone (translucent back) and Snowfall (silver-white).
We like the 9 Pro’s built quality: all the gaps on the phone are small and even. It once again has a seamless display with the front camera hidden beneath the panel. The under-display camera is meanwhile virtually invisible and can only be located when you view it from certain angles with lots of light shining on the display. The rear cameras are flush with the phone’s body – something you don’t see often nowadays. They are likewise covered by an unspecified glass.
The gaming phone doesn’t have any IP certification, but the sealed SIM slot suggests that there is at least some basic protection against splashing water.
The phone is similar to its predecessor when it comes to features. On the right side of the phone, you’ll once again find two touch-sensitive dedicated triggers. They provide good haptic feedback and feel very responsive during gaming.
The integrated USB port not only delivers high data transfer speeds (copy test: 635.9 MB/s) but also supports video output via a cable. This means you can easily mirror the screen or load up a desktop version of RedMagic Game Space (up to Full HD and 144Hz).
{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_339685’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_343088’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_343088’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_343653’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_343653’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_338006’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_338006’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌
The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro supports all conventional mobile communications standards with a wide frequency coverage. Wireless LAN connectivity is really snappy and stable with Wi-Fi 7 as well as in both the 5.0 GHz and 6.0 GHz range.
The phone offers decent voice quality as long as you hold it to your ear. That said, noise suppression is average at best, and the RedMagic sounds slightly echoey in speaker mode.
For operating system, the phone comes with Android 14 with Nubia’s RedMagic OS 9.0 custom UI. At the time of review, the security patches were dated 1 November 2023 and thus no longer completely up to date. Based on experience, updates are only rolled out sporadically. Nubia has merely promised to provide one major update and two years of security patches.
Biometric security is handled by an in-display optical fingerprint scanner that does its job adequately and can measure heart rate to boot. Alternatively or additionally, you can use facial recognition via the front camera, but this method is less secure.
Apart from the two extra capacitive shoulder triggers, there is a striking, red button built into the frame that lets you switch to a special gaming interface on the phone: the RedMagic Game Space. It lets users customise settings for individual games and manage any paired accessories.
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1688 (829-1880)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1577-1828)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (654-1703)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (659-1568)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1500-1710)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (767-825)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1801 (1553-1882)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (475-989)
Nothing much has changed with the front camera. The under-display camera has a beauty mode at its disposal, but images still look muddy and lack detail even when this function is disabled. Pictures also quickly become extremely noisy in low-light conditions.
The main camera module now has one lens fewer than its predecessor. The wide-angle sensor is identical to the one on the RedMagic 8S Pro but now has optical image stabilisation (OIS). The second lens has 50 MP as well and can be used to take both ultra-wide and macro images. Whilst lacking any optical zoom, the phone is capable of up to ten times digital zoom. Photos taken with the RedMagic 9 Pro have a nice level of detail but look somewhat washed-out and dull.
You can record videos at up to 8K (30 fps) with the main shooter and Full HD (30 fps) with the front camera.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
click to load images
In terms of general specs, the display on the RedMagic 9 Pro remains unchanged from the previous generation: it’s a 6.8-inch Full HD+ panel capable of up to 120Hz refresh rate. Though colour accuracy and brightness have been further improved.
With the ambient light sensor enabled, the AMOLED display hit an average peak brightness of 1,031 cd/m² whilst showing a completely white image. When bright and dark areas are distributed evenly (APL 18), the panel even managed to get as bright as 1,242 cd/m². It also reached a similar level for HDR playback. The display has a manual max brightness of 589 cd/m².
Like all OLED panels, the screen on RedMagic 9 Pro isn’t spared from flickering either. That said, Nubia uses high-frequency PWM dimming at 2,160Hz to make the display as comfortable to the eye as possible.
1012 cd/m² |
1023 cd/m² |
1048 cd/m² |
||
1017 cd/m² |
1035 cd/m² |
1054 cd/m² |
||
1011 cd/m² |
1036 cd/m² |
1042 cd/m² |
||
Distribution of brightness
BOE Q9+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1054 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1030.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1035 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480×1116, 6.80 |
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro AMOLED, 2480×1116, 6.80 |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.67 |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro OLED, 2400×1080, 6.78 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times |
-77% |
20% |
218% |
|
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * |
0.8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.4015, 0.401) |
2.06 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.027, 1.03) -158% |
1.09 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.527, 0.5615) -36% |
1.18 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.5235, 0.655) -48% |
Response Time Black / White * |
1.08 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.539, 0.5365) |
1.88 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.065, 0.819) -74% |
1.13 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.569, 0.559) -5% |
1.14 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.6525, 0.483) -6% |
PWM Frequency |
60 |
60 0% |
120.3 101% |
485 708% |
Screen |
-21% |
6% |
-30% |
|
Brightness middle |
1035 |
775 -25% |
1002 -3% |
1699 64% |
Brightness |
1031 |
778 -25% |
1004 -3% |
1698 65% |
Brightness Distribution |
96 |
98 2% |
95 -1% |
98 2% |
Black Level * | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * |
1 |
1.3 -30% |
0.8 20% |
1.9 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * |
1.9 |
2.4 -26% |
1.7 11% |
4.7 -147% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * |
1.6 |
1.9 -19% |
1.4 12% |
2.8 -75% |
Gamma |
2.25 98% |
2.28 96% |
2.23 99% |
2.26 97% |
CCT |
6368 102% |
6693 97% |
6468 100% |
6648 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) |
-49% / |
13% / |
94% / |
* … smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.08 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.539 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5365 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.7 ms). |
||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4015 ms rise | |
↘ 0.401 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18379 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is one of the first smartphones available globally to feature the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Thanks to the built-in fan, which runs even quieter (max. 39 dB(A)) than the one in the 8S Pro, the phone is able to keep the processor running stably at peak performance most of the time.
In our browser benchmarks, we noticed that the RedMagic phone and Chrome don’t play particularly well together. Results were surprisingly poor when Google’s browser was used. Things were different when we used Microsoft Edge, for example.
We ran the Burnout benchmark (CPU + GPU) to simulate a heavy load. The RedMagic 9 Pro crashed after about ten minutes and required a restart. The device overheated despite having a fan. Subsequent measurements were thus carried out with only CPU load enabled. Even so, the gaming phone became very hot.
The two speakers on the RedMagic 9 Pro can get really loud, but they already sound tinny and empty at moderate volume levels.
The Nubia phone truly shines when it comes to battery life. The battery has a whopping 6,500 mAh capacity and lasted an outstanding 17 hours in our Wi-Fi test.
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1575 – 1702, n=6) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (119 – 2138, n=218, last 2 years) |
|
Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5393 – 6543, n=6) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (473 – 6681, n=218, last 2 years) |
|
Geekbench 6.2 | |
Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (2127 – 2329, n=8) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (193 – 2930, n=79, last 2 years) |
|
Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (6765 – 7501, n=8) |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (845 – 7408, n=79, last 2 years) |
|
PCMark for Android – Work 3.0 | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (15876 – 21628, n=6) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (4761 – 21385, n=211, last 2 years) |
|
Antutu v10 – Total Score | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1905751 – 2162423, n=6) |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (461567 – 2162423, n=31, last 2 years) |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
3DMark | |
Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (19319 – 19690, n=4) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (392 – 20068, n=200, last 2 years) |
|
Wild Life Extreme | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4744 – 5338, n=5) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (22 – 5226, n=205, last 2 years) |
|
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4729 – 5185, n=4) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (109 – 5248, n=198, last 2 years) |
|
Solar Bay Score | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8547 – 8720, n=3) |
|
Average of class Smartphone (3332 – 8720, n=19, last 2 years) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8668 – 8758, n=2) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (3229 – 8758, n=19, last 2 years) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (60 – 121, n=6) |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 – 123, n=225, last 2 years) |
|
1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (162 – 241, n=7) |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 – 229, n=225, last 2 years) |
|
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (60 – 93, n=6) |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 – 100, n=225, last 2 years) |
|
2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64 – 96, n=8) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 – 94, n=225, last 2 years) |
|
3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (37 – 42, n=6) |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (vulkan 1.0) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (0.38 – 42, n=190, last 2 years) |
|
Octane V2 – Total Score | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Edge 120) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Chrome 120) |
|
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 (Edge 121.0.2277.84) |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 – 70135, n=6) |
|
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (Chrome 120.0.6099.115) |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Chrome 120) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Edge 115) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 115) |
|
Average of class Smartphone (4633 – 89112, n=202, last 2 years) |
|
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560×1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø58.9 (15.2-100.4)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø71.5 (17.9-136.2)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560×1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø13.9 (9.4-22)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø16.9 (10.9-48.7)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 |
-19% |
-42% |
-3% |
-12% |
-61% |
|
Sequential Read 256KB |
4164.08 |
3576.35 -14% |
1876.8 -55% |
4016.67 -4% |
3689 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3344 – 4512, n=12) -11% |
1394 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(215 – 4512, n=212, last 2 years) -67% |
Sequential Write 256KB |
3199.98 |
2682.03 -16% |
1773.94 -45% |
3153.4 -1% |
2940 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1891 – 3518, n=12) -8% |
1005 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(57.5 – 3518, n=212, last 2 years) -69% |
Random Read 4KB |
442.82 |
369.76 -16% |
342.04 -23% |
434.63 -2% |
419 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(268 – 480, n=12) -5% |
237 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(22.2 – 543, n=212, last 2 years) -46% |
Random Write 4KB |
691.17 |
479.52 -31% |
372.35 -46% |
648 -6% |
515 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(174.3 – 701, n=12) -25% |
255 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13 – 701, n=213, last 2 years) -63% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum: 55.1 °C = 131 F Average: 53.8 °C = 129 F |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum: 51.6 °C = 125 F Average: 48 °C = 118 F |
Power Supply (max.) 26.9 °C = 80 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø117.1 (117-117.1)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27 (24.8-28.8)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2)
Pros
+ bright, accurate and fast display
+ high performance
+ additional touch sensors
+ long battery life
Cons
– can get very hot
– short update support period
– no IP certification
– no wireless charging
The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is a minor step forward from its predecessor, the 8S Pro. Familiar highlights such as configurable LEDs and extra shoulder buttons are once again on board and essentially unchanged. Besides having the latest Qualcomm SoC, the gaming phone also offers a brighter display, a quieter fan and a larger battery. The new camera setup has been improved as well. Furthermore, the phone can now charge at up to 80 watts.
The RedMagic 9 Pro is a powerful gaming phone with a small price tag. But it can get very hot.
Though it’s nice that the fan now runs quieter, the cooling solution wasn’t enough to keep the phone from shutting down during our stress test. Nubia would do well to throttle the SoC slightly rather than going for all-out performance. Whilst overheating isn’t an issue when gaming, surface temperatures can run high.
A handful of features are also missing, such as wireless charging and IP certification, both of which can be overlooked given the product’s focus. However, a device in this price range should have eSIM support.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is the RedMagic 9 Pro’s toughest competitor. If you mostly care about performance, other high-end smartphones may likewise be great alternatives for you, not least the Nubia Z60 Ultra.
The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is available in three configurations:
Colour | RAM/Storage | Price (RRP) |
---|---|---|
Sleet | 12/256 GB | €649/US$649 |
Cyclone | 16/512 GB | €799/US$799 |
Snowfall | 16/512 GB | €799/US$799 |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
–
02/05/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Application Performance
96 / 90 → 100%
Smartphone – Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt – Managing Editor Mobile – 554 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.
Translator: Zhiwei Zhuang – Translator – 123 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022
After graduating with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering, I moved from Singapore to
Cologne in 2014 and began pursuing a career as a freelance translator. Much of my translation work
focuses on science, engineering and technology. My fascination with computers and mobile
electronics began when I was young. And I have fond memories reading countless tech and gaming
magazines. Working with Notebookcheck gives me the opportunity to incorporate my personal
interests into my professional work.
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02- 6 (Update: 2024-02- 6)